Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- meetings:general_meetings:3rd_unidive_general_meeting_call_for_abstracts [2024/10/24 01:18] – [Program Committee] ranka.stankovic
+++ meetings:general_meetings:3rd_unidive_general_meeting_call_for_abstracts [2024/10/29 15:18] (current) – [Important dates] ranka.stankovic
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
   * 21 October   2024:		Notification of acceptance
   * 26 October   2024:		Communication of the names of the presenters
-  * 09 November  2024:		Final versions of abstracts
+  * 11 November  2024:		Final versions of abstracts
+  * 18 January   2025:          Poster and booster slide
   * 28 January   2025:          WG2 meeting
   * 29-30 January 2025:		UniDive 3rd general meeting
@@ Line 49: / Line 50: @@
 ==== Program Committee ====
-<wrap hide> For the Budapest UniDive workshop, we wish an inclusive and diverse Program Committee.
-Anyone who feels competent in any domain of UniDive can join the Program Committee as a **reviewer**.
-To volunteer, please, fill in [[https://forms.gle/dizfx1fHQu1Ke3Kf9|this form]] no later than the **25th of September 2024**.
-The abstract review period will be: **3-16 October 2024**. We expect **no more than 3-4 abstracts** of **two pages** each per reviewer.
- The more reviewers we recruit, the lower the reviewing charge. </wrap>
   * Ana Ostroški Anić, Institute for the Croatian Language (Croatia)
   * Dimitra Anastasiou, Luxembourg Institute of Science & Technology
@@ Line 128: / Line 121: @@
   * Joakim Nivre, Uppsala University (Sweden)
   * Ranka Stanković, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology (Serbia)
+<wrap hide> For the Budapest UniDive workshop, we wish an inclusive and diverse Program Committee.
+Anyone who feels competent in any domain of UniDive can join the Program Committee as a **reviewer**.
+To volunteer, please, fill in [[https://forms.gle/dizfx1fHQu1Ke3Kf9|this form]] no later than the **25th of September 2024**.
+The abstract review period will be: **3-16 October 2024**. We expect **no more than 3-4 abstracts** of **two pages** each per reviewer.
+ The more reviewers we recruit, the lower the reviewing charge. </wrap>