Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wg3:wg3_meeting_2023-09-08 [2023/09/20 21:19] – [Ways of Working] joakim.nivre
+++ wg3:wg3_meeting_2023-09-08 [2023/09/26 10:22] (current) – [Multilingual Evaluation Campaigns] joakim.nivre
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===== WG3 2nd Meeting Minutes – 2023-09-08 =====
-The second WG meeting was mainly devoted to the two tasks/deliverables outlined in the MoU, documentation of multilingual language tools and multilingual evaluation campaigns. In addition, we discussed ways of working in the WG.
+The second WG meeting was mainly devoted to the two tasks/deliverables outlined in the MoU, documentation of multilingual language tools and organization of multilingual evaluation campaigns. In addition, we discussed ways of working in the WG.
 ==== Documentation of Multilingual Language Technology Tools ====
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
       * Should we try to integrate typology resources? How?
+The WG leaders will call a meeting with the task leaders to discuss next steps. Anyone else who would like to be involved in this task is welcome to contact the task leaders. The goal is to select a platform and define the scope of the task before the first general meeting in 2024.
 ==== Multilingual Evaluation Campaigns ====
@@ Line 39: / Line 40: @@
    * A. Wróblewska: NLPre Benchmarking Platform ({{ :wg3:EvalCampaign_Alina.pdf|abstract}})
    * O. Goldman, L. Weissweiler and R. Tsarfaty: Morpho-Syntactic Analyso-Parsing ({{ :wg3:EvalCampaign_Omer.pdf|abstract}}, {{ :wg3:EvalCampaign_Omer_Slides.pdf|slides}})
-   * T. Samardzic: Subword Pooling
+   * T. Samardzic: Subword Pooling ({{ :wg3:EvalCampaign_Tanja.pdf|slides}})
-The proposals were discussed in breakout groups, followed by a general plenary discussion where several other ideas for evaluation campaigns were proposed as well. The WG leaders will call a meeting with the proposers to discuss next steps. Anyone else who would like to be involved in this task are welcome to contact the WG leaders. The goal is to organize at least one evaluation campaign during 2024 and a different one during 2025.
+The proposals were discussed in breakout groups, followed by a general plenary discussion where several other ideas for evaluation campaigns were proposed as well. The WG leaders will call a meeting with the proposers to discuss next steps. Anyone else who would like to be involved in this task is welcome to contact the WG leaders. The goal is to organize at least one evaluation campaign during 2024 and a different one during 2025.
 ==== Ways of Working ====